How the Covid19 Vaccines Are Breaking the Law

The current Covid19 debacle is a media, government, mogul and megalomaniac collaboration to reduce the world population by means of health care, vaccines, reproductive health services (i.e. abortions) and more as stated by Bill Gates in the video below. 

It seems they are in a hurry to achieve this goal because they are violating the international statutes based on the Nuremberg Code to achieve their goals. Here is a short introduction to the code and it's effects on international law.  

Notice that criteria a) has been broken because underaged children of 12 are being allowed to make a decision on an experimental vaccine that has killed an under-reported 9000 people in America already. 

Criteria b) has been broken because there is widespread coercion to take the Covid19 experimental vaccine, which includes prizes and lies about it's absolute safety perpetrated by the media and medical boards.

Criteria c) is being broken because the people are not being told that they may die from this vaccine before they take it. Read more about the code below.

The Nuremberg Code (German: Nürnberger Kodex) is a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation created by the USA v Brandt court as one result of the Nuremberg trials at the end of the Second World War.

Voluntary consent is the first and absolutely essential premise of the normative framework set out in the Nuremberg Code. The heinous crimes perpetrated by Nazi doc- tors provided tragic evidence that “the theme of human rights in human experimentation is a universal one. 

The need to respect the humanity and self-determination of all humans is central to the ethos not only of medicine and human experimentation but of all civilized societies” [321: 7]. In order to avoid the risk of exploitation, the Code introduced some fundamental criteria, which today appear obvious and well-established:[these are] 

a) legal capacity; 

b) free power of choice, “without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion;” 

c) sufficient knowledge and comprehension “of the elements of the subject matter involved”, as to enable persons “to make an understanding and enlightened decision” (art. 1). 

Suffice it to mention, as illustrative examples, the Declaration of Helsinki as last amended in Fortaleza in October 2013 and the new Ethical Guidelines issued by CIOMS in 2016. According to art. 25 of the Declaration, “no individual capable of giving informed consent may be enrolled in a research study unless he or she freely agrees”. Researchers—according to the Guidelines—“have a duty to provide potential research participants with the information and the opportunity to give their free and informed consent”. 

This consent should be understood as a “process”, which entails the duty to ensure “that the person has adequately understood the material facts and has decided or refused to participate without having been subjected to coercion, undue influence, or deception” [322: 33 (GL 9)]. Against this consolidated background, the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, adopted in 2005, is no exception.

Read more

Pitfalls of Using Strong’s Numbers

Since 1890 when James Strong published his Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, people everywhere have used this work for their personal Bible study. By using the concordance, they could look up a verse by any word they remembered in that verse and find its location in the Bible. Before the age of computers, a concordance like the one compiled by Strong was the way to find a verse in the Bible if one had forgotten in which book and chapter the desired verse was to be found.

But that was not all for which Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance was useful. If a person was reading their Bible and wanted to find other verses that contained the same English word as a particular word that had caught their attention, they could look that word up in the concordance (since every English word in the Authorized Version of the Bible was alphabetically listed) and find other verses that utilized that same word. This procedure became a handy tool for finding cross-references to the verse or passage one might be reading or studying.

And there was yet a further component to James Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance. Every Hebrew word (in the Old Testament) and Greek word (in the New Testament) was assigned a number. By looking up the English word, one could find the corresponding Hebrew or Greek number underlying the English word, and by this method could determine whether the same Hebrew and/or Greek word was the original from which the English word had been translated. Since many different English words were used to translated a given Hebrew or Greek word (depending upon the context), this gave the English reader the advantage of knowing if more than one Hebrew or Greek word was represented by a single English word. As an example, consider Genesis 39:6 as compared to Genesis 42:7.

And he left all that he had in Joseph’s hand; and he knew not ought he had, save the bread which he did eat. And Joseph was a goodly person, and well favoured. (Gen 39:6, KJV)

And Joseph saw his brethren, and he knew them, but made himself strange unto them, and spake roughly unto them; and he said unto them, Whence come ye? And they said, From the land of Canaan to buy food. (Gen 42:7, KJV)

In both verses the English word “knew” is found. One might wonder: “Do each of these occurrences translate the same Hebrew word?” Opening up Strong’s Concordance to the word “knew,” and finding each of the verses, one discovers that the number assigned to the word “knew” is different in these two verses. In Gen 39:6 “knew” has the number 3045 while in Gen 42:7 “knew” has the number 5234. Going to the back of the Concordance where the Hebrew and Greek numbering system is laid out in numerical order, one finds that #3045 designates ידַָע (yāda‘) while #5234 designates the Hebrew word נכַָר (nākar). By this method, the reader is alerted to the fact that different Hebrew words lay behind the same English word used by the KJV translators.

Click here to read the full article